Ticket ID: SIXXS #7590950 Ticket Status: Resolved PoP: brudi01 - (Uberlandia)
DLV DNSSEC duplicated / wrong delegation
Carmen Sandiego on Friday, 10 August 2012 20:31:21
Username: FCL5-SIXXS
rzone 2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa is published in DLV (this is OK)
rzone 8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa is published in DLV (this is NOT OK)
rzone 8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa should be delegated at 2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa, but it isn't, and that causes failure to validate the records.
More info according to dnsviz.net:
Bogus:
- 0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa to 8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa:There are no DS RRs for 8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa in 0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa, but the NSEC or NSEC3 RRs supplied were insufficient to prove their non-existence.
Errors:
- 0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa to 8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa:The NSEC or NSEC3 RRs are insufficient to prove non-existence of DS RRs for 8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa.
- RRSIG rm2vhjou5a5f9gjtqv5b3spcr2jv71om.8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa/NSEC3 by 8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa/DNSKEY alg 8, key 10611:The signer name field (8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa) does not match the zone name (0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa).
- RRSIG rm2vhjou5a5f9gjtqv5b3spcr2jv71om.8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa/NSEC3 by 8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa/DNSKEY alg 8, key 27036:The signer name field (8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa) does not match the zone name (0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa).
Ref: http://dnsviz.net/d/0.8.3.8.0.0.2.0.1.9.2.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa/dnssec/
State change: confirmed
Jeroen Massar on Friday, 17 August 2012 17:59:42
The state of this ticket has been changed to confirmed
State change: resolved
Jeroen Massar on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 00:20:37
The state of this ticket has been changed to resolved
DLV DNSSEC duplicated / wrong delegation
Jeroen Massar on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 00:24:12
All zones served by ns{123}.sixxs.net are now fully signed, this thus closes the noted problem where the default-subnets where not being signed as they where in the tunnel space.
Note that the sixxs.net/org/com zones itself are NOT dnssec-signed, only the ones served by ns{123}.sixxs.net, of which a few are delegated below the sixxs.net zone. One also still needs DLV for the zones verification to actually work.
One minor side-effect is that our nsd instances are now using 1G of memory, each...
Posting is only allowed when you are logged in. |