SixXS::Sunset 2017-06-06

Multicast status
[si] Shadow Hawkins on Monday, 10 March 2008 17:54:13
Hi! What is the status of multicast ? The FAQ (https://noc.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=multicast) says it is experimental. I thought multicast is an integral part of IPv6 (not an option, like in IPv4). Why is it not just working ? Implementation problems ? ISP policy ? Regards, David
Multicast status
[si] Shadow Hawkins on Wednesday, 09 September 2009 19:05:11
I don't see any page in wiki about multicast setup, so I will (slowly) write one. This will be my first try with multicast on a SixXS tunnel, so a few hints would be welcome: - if I have a single PC as tunnel endpoint, with no subnet, is ecmh required to run? - can regular hosts with Teredo tunnels (Vista, miredo, etc) receive multicast traffic from my PC? - if not, how can I do tests (one host sending, other receiving)? Request another SixXS tunnel? Or an IPv6 tunnel from other provider (like go6, etc..)? Would that work? Can I get access to m6bone some other way? More to come... David
Multicast status
[it] Shadow Hawkins on Saturday, 11 December 2010 09:20:04
I'd love to play a little with IPv6 multicast. Back in the good University days I got the original Mbone connection setup and did quite a few demos using vic/vat/nv on the NASA TV feed from the USA. There was no video on the Internet back then, we're talking 1993/1994... ;-) What strikes me as odd is this bit of the SixXS multicast FAQ:
[bold]How to enable your subnet to do Multicast[/bold] If you want to enable multicast in your subnet, then you first need to check if your PoP supports this. When this is the case, you need to install ecmh on the host that terminates your tunnel and effectively all routers in between your host and the PoP.
I am wondering, why is the underlined part needed at all? These routers belong to the many ISPs that my AYIYA tunnel traverses on the way to the SixXS PoP, I don't see why I should bother do anything with the IPv4 routers that handle my AYIYA tunnel... Now, I should get my tunnel fixed before I can do a multicast test, but that's a different story... :-) Ciao, Luca
Multicast status
[ch] Jeroen Massar SixXS Staff on Monday, 10 March 2008 18:18:53
That "status" is experimental for the SixXS PoPs. For IPv6 Multicast is a more or less a requirement, otherwise things like Neighbor Discovery and Router Advertisements would not even work. Routing IPv6 Multicast is a completely different story though, and for mostly the same reasons as IPv4, it is hard to get a good setup and have it working correctly without taking a completely network down. As such, we have marked IPv6 Multicast on the SixXS PoPs as experimental, one can thus play with it, but we can't guarantee that it will work though.
Multicast status
[si] Shadow Hawkins on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 10:30:24
Thanks. 1.) Re: experimental... So it works ? Sometimes ? To what degree ? 2.) What is the outlook for when IPv6 is widespread ? Will multicast be like stepchild (as it is now in IPv4) or are there good chances that the issues will be sorted out ? Regards, David
Multicast status
[de] Shadow Hawkins on Saturday, 22 March 2008 11:29:46
hello mcasters, i finally made it :-) "dbeacon" is running on my mac leopard server !!! <http://www.stattfernsehen.com/matrix/> Just "cron" needs to be set up , could somepne tell me why i dont see any other beacons on my matrix ? Think i need to update my matrix.conf and how does dbeacon naming his history files ? could some one provide me some info for matrix.conf ? thanks so much Marc
Multicast status
[ch] Jeroen Massar SixXS Staff on Saturday, 22 March 2008 14:47:30
See the updated FAQ for an example.
Multicast status
[si] Shadow Hawkins on Thursday, 25 November 2010 18:04:04
The FAQ says: you need to install ecmh on the host that terminates your tunnel and effectively all routers in between your host and the PoP. The last part is a bit ambiguous. I think it would make sense in this form "on all routers between your/my tunnel endpoint and the host that want to send/receive multicast." Because a SixXS user has not much affect to the routers between the PoP and own host (the part from the PoP to own tunnel endpoint), which is another way ti understand the sentence from the FAQ.
Multicast status
[si] Shadow Hawkins on Friday, 10 December 2010 18:45:12
Is it correct, that modern OS kernels , like recent Linux v2.6.x, that support MLDv1 and MLDv2, don't need ecmh ?

Please note Posting is only allowed when you are logged in.

Static Sunset Edition of SixXS
©2001-2017 SixXS - IPv6 Deployment & Tunnel Broker